IFPI Sets Global Chart Rules for Generative AI Music

The IFPI introduced a framework to determine when recordings made with generative AI qualify for official music charts.
IFPI headquarters sign with text introducing eligibility principles for generative AI music in official charts. IFPI headquarters sign with text introducing eligibility principles for generative AI music in official charts.

The International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) has published three principles that will govern whether recordings created with generative artificial intelligence can appear in official music charts. Announced on 30 July, the framework is designed to separate human-driven music from entirely synthetic tracks and to block entries linked to stream manipulation.

Eligibility Criteria

Under the new rules, an AI-assisted recording qualifies for chart inclusion only if three conditions are met. The generative AI service used must be lawful and properly authorised, the recording must be substantially created by humans, and the track must not be associated with any form of stream or chart manipulation.

The IFPI said the principles were developed in consultation with its global member companies. They are intended to offer a common reference for AI-assisted recordings in official chart compilers, music industry bodies, and other stakeholders.

Initial Rollout

The organisation will first apply the framework to official charts it directly manages across Latin America, the Middle East, Africa, and Southeast Asia. It will also work through its national group network to encourage adoption by more than 20 additional official chart organisations worldwide.

The move follows similar guidelines announced earlier in July by a coalition of major music companies, including Sony Music, Universal Music Group, and Warner Music Group.

Executive Comments

IFPI chief executive Victoria Oakley said the charts should continue to reflect human artistry. “Official music charts do more than just track sales; they celebrate human artistry and endeavour,” she said. “As fans, we want to recognise the achievements of the artists creating the music we love, and it’s right that charts continue to showcase music with human creativity at its heart.”

Oakley acknowledged that properly licensed AI offers creative opportunities. “When properly licensed and authorised, AI provides exciting opportunities to enhance the creative toolkit,” she said. “These principles provide a pathway for that innovation, while ensuring we don’t include tracks generated by systems that are ripping off artists and their music.”

She added that the music community must take the lead as the technology evolves. “AI is evolving rapidly, and it’s critical that the music community takes the lead on how to ensure technology and human artistry grow together responsibly.”

Previous Post
A courtroom gavel resting on sheet music, symbolizing the German court ruling against Suno in the GEMA AI copyright infringement case.

German Court Rules Against Suno in GEMA AI Copyright Case

Next Post
Pakistani Artist Streams Grew Sevenfold on Spotify. The Law That Pays Them Was Written in 1962.

Pakistani Artist Streams Grew Sevenfold on Spotify. The Law That Pays Them Was Written in 1962.