BPI Report Counts 274 AI Licensing Deals Across Creative Industries

A report commissioned by the British Phonographic Industry (BPI) tallied 274 commercial AI licensing agreements across the creative industries by early 2026, while independent music companies show limited participation.
A report cover showing the number of AI licensing agreements signed across the creative industries, with charts and music-related icons. A report cover showing the number of AI licensing agreements signed across the creative industries, with charts and music-related icons.

A report commissioned by the British Phonographic Industry (BPI) has found that rightsholders across the creative sector entered into 274 commercial artificial intelligence licensing agreements by early 2026, signalling a rapid expansion of AI-related dealmaking.

The study, produced by WPI Economics, was cited by the Featured Artists Coalition in connection with an open letter endorsed by 31 organisations advocating for consent-based approaches to AI licensing and data usage.

Deal Landscape

The agreements span a range of creative fields. While some focus on content identification and rights management technologies, the majority involve generative AI systems trained on copyrighted works.

Examples include partnerships between Sony Music Entertainment and Vermillio, and between Universal Music Group and ProRata.ai. Other deals reference companies such as Spotify, ElevenLabs, BandLab and Splice.

Independent Sector Lags Behind

Despite the surge in licensing activity, engagement among independent music companies remains low. A survey of 31 BPI independent members found that only 16% had begun exploring AI licensing partnerships.

Among medium-sized firms, 25% had completed an AI licensing deal, while just 5% of smaller companies had done so. However, 77% of respondents said they would be willing to license their music for what they consider ethical AI uses.

Consumer Attitudes

The report also examined public sentiment through a survey of 3,000 consumers. It found that 13% had used music-generating AI tools, and 6% had paid for such services.

Among those who paid for AI tools, 65% agreed that economic benefits generated by AI should be shared with creators whose works contributed to training the systems. Support fell to 60% among users of free AI services and to 47% among those who had never used AI tools.

Previous Post
Rapper Fenix Flexin, whose song 'Rubberz' sparked AI-generated music accusations.

AI in Music: Traxsource Labeling, Snapchat Ads, and SZA’s Warning

Next Post
Graphic illustrating the contrast between 106,000 daily music uploads and the small fraction that achieve significant streams, alongside AI-generated music statistics.

intellijend Data: Spotify Velocity Drives Discovery Amid 106K Daily Uploads