SAMRO’s FY2026 Cycle and the Needletime Drag That Will Not Close on Its Own

SAMRO’s FY2026 distribution framework is rolling out, alongside a member royalties drive. The needletime collection drag still hits amapiano hardest in South African public-performance contexts. What rightsholders should actually do this cycle.
SAMRO logo (Southern African Music Rights Organisation) SAMRO logo (Southern African Music Rights Organisation)

The Southern African Music Rights Organisation, known as SAMRO, opened a two-week royalties and rights support drive at the end of May 2026, the latest in a series of member-facing operational pushes that have run alongside the rollout of its FY2026 distribution framework. The drive is timed to help rightsholders register undocumented works, review statements and update payment details before the next distribution cycle. It is also the most visible signal that South African collective rights administration is still working through the structural drag of needletime royalty collection, three decades after the legal framework for it was put in place.

What needletime is supposed to do

Needletime royalties are the payments due to performers and producers of sound recordings when those recordings are played in public. The right exists in South African law under the Performers’ Protection Act and the Copyright Act, as amended. When a radio station spins a Tyla single, when a Cape Town restaurant plays a Sho Madjozi track on its in-house playlist, when a Durban gym streams a curated playlist over its sound system, a needletime payment is owed to the artists who performed on that recording and to the company that owns the master.

This sits alongside the authors’ rights royalty SAMRO has administered for decades. Needletime in South Africa is collected primarily by SAMPRA, the South African Music Performance Rights Association, and by RiSA Audio Visual, with SAMRO covering performing rights on the composition side. The cheques arrive from different organisations on different schedules.

What the FY2026 framework actually changes

SAMRO’s FY2026 distribution framework runs royalty allocation across six main categories. Radio and General covers broadcast and the general background-music pool. Live covers concerts and venue performances. Television covers broadcast television music use. Film covers cinema. Foreign covers reciprocal collections from overseas societies. MIT covers mechanical and other categories. Royalties continue to be calculated on a music-second basis using channel revenue, duration of use and member share splits.

The changes for FY2026 affect cashflow timing and category weighting more than they change the underlying logic. The Live category in particular has been a long-standing source of friction because event organisers in South Africa frequently do not file the cue sheets that SAMRO needs to allocate royalties to the specific titles performed. Without cue sheets, the Live pool gets distributed by analogue methods that under-pay catalogues with high live use and over-pay catalogues that happen to match general-pool weighting.

SAMRO’s portal tools now allow members to upload set lists, submit live performance reports and reconcile statements directly. The infrastructure has improved considerably over the past two years. The constraint is not the portal. It is whether artists and their managers find the time to file the data the system needs.

The needletime drag the FY2026 framework does not fix

The thing that the new framework cannot solve is the broader question of needletime collection efficiency. South African broadcasters, restaurants, gyms, retail chains and hospitality venues remain unevenly compliant on needletime tariffs. SAMPRA and its enforcement partners pursue licensing, but the cost of policing every commercial venue in the country is meaningful. The result is a needletime pool that under-collects relative to actual use, and a distribution that consequently under-pays the catalogues most heavily used in public performance.

Amapiano is the genre that loses most. It is, by some distance, the most heavily played genre in South African public-performance contexts. Restaurants, taxis, gyms, hotels and weddings play amapiano at a rate that exceeds any other contemporary South African genre. The needletime payments that should flow from those plays are a fraction of what equivalent use would yield under PPL or SoundExchange administration.

That gap is one of the reasons amapiano producers chase international placement so aggressively. The Ibiza set, the BBC Radio 1Xtra spin, the Boiler Room appearance, the streaming pickup in Lagos or London or Paris all generate royalties through structures that pay reliably. The South African public-performance use, which is the actual cultural footprint of the genre, generates a smaller share of the royalty pool than its cultural weight should produce.

The cross-border issue

There is a second drag that the SAMRO framework alone cannot resolve. The reciprocal arrangements between SAMRO, MCSK in Kenya, COSON and PMRS in Nigeria, COSGA in Ghana and the francophone societies under SACEM frameworks remain uneven. When a South African composition is played on Nigerian radio, the royalty flow from COSON or MCSN back to SAMRO and on to the rightsholder is slow at best. When a Nigerian composition is played in South African public performance, the flow in the other direction is similarly slow.

This is not unique to Africa. Reciprocal collection between major societies in Europe and North America is also slow, but the underlying infrastructure is mature enough that the lag is measured in months rather than years. African reciprocal arrangements still depend in some cases on annual reconciliation cycles.

What rightsholders should actually do this cycle

The actionable layer for any composer or recording artist with a SAMRO membership is narrow. Register the catalogue. File set lists for live performances. Reconcile statements quarterly and challenge missing line items in writing. Check that the publisher split is recorded correctly and that the IPI numbers on file are current. The portal does what it is supposed to do. The friction is in the discipline of using it.

For the next eighteen months, the larger question is whether SAMRO, SAMPRA, MCSK, COSON, COSGA and the francophone societies move towards the kind of pan-African operational coordination that European societies have built through CISAC. The framework exists. The political will to deploy it has been the gap. The current royalties drive is the right moment to start measuring whether that gap is closing.

Previous Post
M-Pesa official logo on white background with green brand bars

The Last Mile: Mobile Money, Data Caps and the African Rights Stack

Next Post
Gaana logo — Indian music streaming service

Damroo, Gaana and the Regional-Language Streaming Wave Rewriting Indian Music Distribution